SWATCH AG v. Panavision Europe Limited

SWATCH AG

Decision

The opponent has not adduced evidence or put forward convincing arguments to demonstrate that use of the contested mark in relation to the goods and services covered by it would cause a dilution of the earlier mark through the dispersion of its identity and its hold upon the public mind. Hence, the opponent’s appeal is rejected.

Comparison of Trademarks

SWATCH

SWATCHBALL